The Five Issues Keeping Credit Union Executives Up at Night
Created by Steven J. Berkowitz | Research Assistant: Claude AI
March 18, 2026
Subscribe to my newsletter and articles on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7392939880244355072/
or my free Substack:
Issue #1: AI-Powered Fraud Threatens Member Trust at Scale
The Trend
Criminals now deploy AI tools to manufacture deepfake videos, clone member voices, fabricate synthetic identities, and run phishing campaigns at a scale and speed that far outpaces most credit union defenses. Deloitte’s Center for Financial Services projects that generative AI could enable fraud losses to reach $40 billion in the United States by 2027, up from $12.3 billion in 2023. Deepfake technology creates convincing fake videos and audio, and fraudsters use synthetic voices to bypass voice-based authentication systems.
Why It Matters
Credit unions carry decades of member trust as a core value. One high-profile fraud incident destroys that trust in hours.
Authorized push payment fraud convinces members to willingly authorize fraudulent transactions themselves, making recovery difficult and creating disputes about liability.
A KnowBe4 analysis found that 82.6% of phishing emails now exhibit AI use, which means fraud detection programs built for yesterday’s threat patterns will fail against today’s attacks.
Smaller and mid-size credit unions often lack the fraud operations staff to monitor and respond in real time, creating a gap that criminals exploit.
Actions to Consider
Retire voice-based authentication now. Replace it with multi-factor, phishing-resistant methods. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned at a Federal Reserve event that AI-generated voices can easily bypass voiceprint authentication systems.
Build a member fraud education program as a service, not a compliance task. Treat fraud prevention outreach as a member benefit. Create short, channel-native content (video, text alerts, in-app messages) that teaches members to recognize deepfakes and social engineering.
Invest in AI-powered fraud detection that operates in real time. Match the sophistication of the attack with the sophistication of the defense. Evaluate vendors who specialize in behavioral analytics and anomaly detection at the transaction level.
Conduct a board-level tabletop exercise on a deepfake fraud scenario. Board members must understand the operational, reputational, and financial exposure — not just receive a briefing.
Issue #2: Loan Portfolio Stress and Margin Compression Converge
The Trend
Credit union loan performance has deteriorated to its worst level in over a decade at the same moment that margin pressure from high-cost deposits continues. The NCUA identifies the overall delinquency rate and rolling 12-month loss rate as being at their highest point in over a decade, with asset quality deterioration and elevated loan losses remaining material contributors to balance sheet stress, especially where higher-cost funding such as share certificates and borrowings limit margin recovery. The 60-day-plus delinquency rate rose to 1.02% on December 31, 2025.
Source: NCUA 2026 Supervisory Priorities
Why It Matters
Some credit unions face a convergence of financial and credit pressures unlike any seen in more than a decade, with loan performance weakening industrywide and rising delinquencies and charge-offs putting renewed focus on credit risk management and capital planning.
With a lower rate environment expected in 2026, credit unions will begin to see margin compression as rates decline.
NCUA examiners will focus on credit administration, loan underwriting, loss mitigation programs, Allowance for Credit Loss reserves and methodologies, and charge-off practices. Institutions without governance structures in place will face examination scrutiny on top of financial stress.
Members at the lower end of the credit spectrum face the most pressure, and credit unions have a mission obligation to serve them — even as the risk of doing so rises.
Actions to Consider
Stress-test the loan portfolio now, not at year-end. Model scenarios that include a further 25-basis-point rate cut, a 15% increase in delinquencies, and a 10% decline in auto values. Present results to the board with capital response options.
Review and tighten underwriting standards in segments showing the most stress, particularly credit cards, unsecured consumer loans, and 2022-2023 auto originations. Vintage analysis shows loans originated in 2022-2023, when loan growth peaked, are driving current delinquency trends.
Develop proactive loan modification and workout programs before members reach default. Intervening at 30 days delinquent costs less and preserves more relationships than collections at 90 days.
Rebuild liquidity buffers through deposit strategy. Credit union savings balances are expected to rise 6% in 2026, providing liquidity relief to institutions that faced tight loan-to-savings ratios near 84% in 2025. Use this window to diversify funding sources.
Issue #3: The Consolidation Wave Demands a Strategic Answer
The Trend
Credit union mergers have accelerated to levels not seen in over a decade, and the pressure intensifies in 2026. The NCUA approved 41 credit union mergers with combined assets of $34 billion in the third quarter of 2025 alone — a single quarter that exceeded the $35 billion in total assets acquired across all credit union mergers from 2022 through 2024. If momentum continues, 2026 could see 200-plus credit union mergers.
Source: CUToday — Why Healthy Credit Unions Are Choosing to Merge and Why 2026 Could Break Records
Why It Matters
Credit union consolidation is increasingly strategic rather than necessity-driven, with 71% of Q3 mergers citing expanded services as the reason — not financial distress.
Technology investment requirements, cybersecurity infrastructure, talent acquisition costs, and member experience expectations now favor scale. Institutions that cannot fund these investments face a decision: merge, partner, or accept an eroding competitive position.
Credit union consolidation picked up in 2025 as the number of credit unions declined 3.7%.
More mergers-of-equals among large institutions will continue, adding complexity to the competitive landscape for mid-size and community-focused credit unions.
Actions to Consider
Make a formal board decision about your institution’s strategic posture. The question is no longer abstract: Do you position as a consolidator, a merger partner, or a committed independent with a funded plan to compete? Boards that avoid the conversation face it anyway — on worse terms.
Build and maintain an M&A readiness file. Document your field of membership reach, technology infrastructure, key vendor contracts, and any operational concentrations. This work serves you whether you initiate, receive, or decline a merger conversation.
Evaluate strategic partnerships and CUSO participation as an alternative to full merger. Shared technology, back-office functions, and lending capacity can deliver some scale benefits without a governance transaction.
Communicate your independence story to members — proactively. Members who understand your mission and value your local relationship become advocates. Members who receive a merger notice with no prior context become noise.
Issue #4: AI Investment Without Governance Creates New Risks
The Trend
Credit unions are adopting AI at speed without the governance structures, data foundations, or oversight frameworks required to deploy it responsibly. 67% of institutions are implementing AI, but only 16% have an enterprise-wide AI roadmap. The NCUA responded in December 2025 by updating its AI resource hub, explicitly framing AI oversight within existing third-party relationship guidance and flagging AI-specific risks including algorithmic opacity, fair lending concerns, and data privacy issues.
Source: Wipfli — 2026 State of Credit Union Industry Report
Why It Matters
Many credit union leaders have voiced concern about AI quietly embedded in vendor products — sometimes without clear visibility into how data is handled or how models operate.
NCUA’s updated AI resource hub signals that supervisory expectations around AI will be grounded in existing, well-known frameworks rather than a bespoke AI rulebook — meaning examiners will use third-party oversight and safety-and-soundness standards to evaluate AI use today.
66% of credit unions now plan to leverage AI for credit decisioning, making lending analytics and underwriting one of the most active AI investment categories, and one of the highest-risk from a fair lending and model governance perspective.
Credit unions that race into AI without governance expose themselves to fair lending violations, data breaches, and exam findings — all at once.
Actions to Consider
Build an AI inventory before your next exam. Identify every AI tool in production or under evaluation — including tools embedded in vendor platforms. Document the use case, the data inputs, the decision outputs, and the oversight mechanism for each.
Assign board-level AI oversight responsibility. The NCUA expects board engagement with AI risk. Designate a board committee, add AI governance to your risk committee charter, and ensure leadership reports to the board on AI use at least quarterly.
Establish a fair lending review process for AI-assisted credit decisions. Any model that influences credit outcomes must have testing for disparate impact. Do not wait for an exam to discover this gap.
Define an AI use policy for staff now. Employees may paste member account details into public AI tools, unknowingly exposing sensitive financial information. A written, enforced policy on permitted AI tools closes this exposure immediately.
Issue #5: Regulatory Uncertainty Paralyzes Strategic Planning
The Trend
The regulatory environment for credit unions faces disruption from two directions simultaneously: the NCUA’s active deregulation project strips away long-standing compliance requirements, while separate proposals in Washington to consolidate or eliminate the NCUA as an independent agency threaten the entire regulatory framework that protects the credit union charter. In 2025 and 2026, the NCUA launched a major initiative to review and revise all its regulations, following Executive Order 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation, with the stated mission to enable access to financial services by facilitating safe, sound, and resilient credit unions.
Source: NCUA Deregulation Project
Why It Matters
In 2025, lawsuits, leadership changes, and shifting priorities across state and federal agencies created uncertainty around everything from overdraft practices to open banking momentum, making it nearly impossible for credit unions to plan with confidence.
Proposals to consolidate the NCUA with agencies like the FDIC or OCC would force credit unions into a regulatory model unsuited to their mission, potentially resulting in higher costs for members and reduced access to financial services.
Trade war escalation, geopolitical shocks, commercial real estate stress, and falling home prices in key markets could trigger spikes in delinquencies and shifts in member behavior, all of which play out against a backdrop of regulatory uncertainty that limits the ability to plan capital deployment or product strategy.
Deregulation creates opportunity, but it also removes guardrails that gave institutions predictability. Compliance teams must monitor a moving target while executives make multi-year technology and capital investments.
Actions to Consider
Engage your league and America’s Credit Unions on the NCUA independence issue now. This is a political fight, not an operational one. Credit union executives must make their voices heard through legislative contacts, comment letters, and coalition advocacy. The window for influence is open today.
Build scenario-based strategic plans, not single-point forecasts. Given regulatory volatility, leadership needs a Plan A (current trajectory), Plan B (NCUA consolidation into broader regulator), and Plan C (accelerated deregulation with reduced oversight). Each scenario has different capital, compliance, and product implications.
Assign staff to monitor NCUA rulemaking in real time. The NCUA deregulation project is actively publishing proposed changes across multiple regulatory domains, with public comment periods open. Each change creates both opportunity and compliance transition cost. Staff must track, analyze, and respond to each proposal on the institution’s behalf.
Document your compliance posture under current rules before changes take effect. Deregulation that removes requirements does not erase exam risk from the transition period. Examiners will still use prior standards until new standards are fully adopted.